Wall Street journal Headline: “Nation Has Proof of Hillary Scandals, But Leftist Media Devote Its Front Pages to Trump Story”
Our media is lost.
It’s a North Korea-style government-run media that exists solely to push the leftist global agenda.
Our media is a propaganda machine, spoon-feeding pablum to a dumbed-down society, unable or unwilling to see what their government is doing to them.
We are worse than North Korea.
Because at least those people KNOW they’re being controlled.
American citizens are too stupid and disengaged to realize how “not free” they are.
From Breitbart:
The Wall Street Journal’s Potomac Watch columnist Kimberley Strassel details the “devastating case against a Clinton presidency” that can be made by reviewing the WikiLeaks documents combined with what is already known in the public record. Strassel notes that although “the nation now has proof of pretty much everything [Hillary Clinton] has been accused of,” the media “has almost uniformly ignored the flurry of bombshells, preferring to devote its front pages” to the story that Donald Trump “made lewd remarks a decade ago and now stands accused of groping women.”
The Obama administration—the federal government, supported by tax dollars—was working as an extension of the Clinton campaign. The State Department coordinated with her staff in responding to the email scandal, and the Justice Department kept her team informed about developments in the court case.
Worse, Mrs. Clinton’s State Department, as documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show, took special care of donors to the Clinton Foundation. In a series of 2010 emails, a senior aide to Mrs. Clinton asked a foundation official to let her know which groups offering assistance with the Haitian earthquake relief were “FOB” (Friends of Bill) or “WJC VIPs” (William Jefferson Clinton VIPs). Those who made the cut appear to have been teed up for contracts. Those who weren’t? Routed to a standard government website.
The leaks show that the foundation was indeed the nexus of influence and money. The head of the Clinton Health Access Initiative, Ira Magaziner, suggested in a 2011 email that Bill Clinton call Sheikh Mohammed of Saudi Arabia to thank him for offering the use of a plane. In response, a top Clinton Foundation official wrote: “Unless Sheikh Mo has sent us a $6 million check, this sounds crazy to do.”
…
The leaks also show that the press is in Mrs. Clinton’s pocket. Donna Brazile, a former Clinton staffer and a TV pundit, sent the exact wording of a coming CNN town hall question to the campaign in advance of the event. Other media allowed the Clinton camp to veto which quotes they used from interviews, worked to maximize her press events and offered campaign advice.
Amy Moreno is a Published Author, Pug Lover & Game of Thrones Nerd. You can follow her on Twitter here and Facebook here.
Support the Trump Movement and help us fight Liberal Media Bias. Please LIKE and SHARE this story on Facebook or Twitter.
We need to go to these liberal sites like yahoo news and bring up the news no one is reporting..I in many cases will just put truthfeed.com, and it works. They come here out of curiosity.
There is no way Russia is behind the leaks and it’s a good thing because they wouldn’t leak the information they would keep it to blackmail her with if she gets elected. Hillary Clinton is a National Security risk subject to blackmail over her lies. Imagine how much control over her Russia would have
Journalist should be an accreditation to aspire to, with ethics requirements, education and experience, with the expectation that their reporting is fair, unbiased and does not represent an advocacy position. Our media has violated every part of what should be a basic ethics requirement to call themselves journalist. If they are biased, there should be a requirement to disclose their advocacy position. Violation of unbiased reporting should have penalties or they should have a journalist board of review where complaints could be filed vy John Q Public and have a regulatory board that shall review the complaints from the public with authority of the oversight board to revoke their “journalist” title or accreditation. The purpose of the oversight board would be to “Protect the Public” from unethical journalist that cause harm to the public. You have no regulatory authority over the biased main stream media, there is a lack of professionalism in their industry that is so obviously biased that journalist may now be more hated than attorneys. Jerks, the John Q Public in on to you jerks.