VIDEO : FBI TURNS AGAINST DIRECTOR COMEY AS HIS TIES TO THE CLINTONS ARE EXPOSED
FBI Director James Comey was on the Hill again, digging himself a deeper hole of bottomless federal corruption as he faced an oversight hearing held by the House Judiciary Committee.
His prepared statements served to block any chance of reopening the case surrounding Hillary’s blatant illegal email debacle regardless of the mounting evidence that was raised after Comey shut the case back in July of 2016.
Breitbart reported “ When President Obama nominated Comey to become FBI director in 2013, Comey promised the United States Senate that he would recuse himself on all cases involving former employers.
But Comey earned $6 million in one year alone from Lockheed Martin. Lockheed Martin became a Clinton Foundation donor that very year.
Comey served as deputy attorney general under John Ashcroft for two years of the Bush administration. When he left the Bush administration, he went directly to Lockheed Martin and became vice president, acting as a general counsel.
According to records, Lockheed Martin is also a member of the American Chamber of Commerce in Egypt, which paid Bill Clinton $250,000 to deliver a speech in 2010.
H/T – Infowars
Amy Moreno is a Published Author, Pug Lover & Game of Thrones Nerd. You can follow her on Twitter here and Facebook here.
Support the Trump Movement and help us fight Liberal Media Bias. Please LIKE and SHARE this story on Facebook or Twitter.
Great,he deserves it going against his oath
LIAR COVER UP THE CORRUPTION
I agree. He belongs in prison with the bitch.
Unfortunately the bitch will never see jail like you and I would. It’s time that we the people tear down the government and put the Clinton’s in prison ourselves.
I totally agree they are all crooked and i pray that they all end up in prison, All respect is gone for Comey!
He is a weasel…
He is a weasel..
dont insult the weasel
Like it or not……….there is only ONE way we will even have a CHANCE of bringing Comey, Hillary and this corrupt administration to justice…….and that is to elect Trump. No, not the most exciting candidate, but at least a CHANCE for breaking up the “establishment” that has a stranglehold on our government. We KNOW what we get with Hillary. NO CHANGE. “Obama III.” Personally, I’ll take that chance with Trump. To me, the simple fact that many republicans also are against him only solidifies the theory that they too are scared to death of Trump blowing the lid off of the corruption. He isn’t riding in on a white horse, nor is he very tactful with much of what he says…….but Hillary is a proven LIAR, and has done much to hurt America. We MUST break this “establishment” government that includes corruption from BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE.
If Hillary Clinton wins ….. American Supreme Court Justice is down the tube.
Why you ask? ….. Ponder this!
Justice Scalia’s seat is vacant. Ginsberg is 82 years old, Kennedy is 79, Breyer is 77, and Thomas is 67. Nowadays, the data shows that the average age of a Supreme Court retirement or death occurs after 75.
These are 5 vacancies that will likely come up over the next 4-8 years. The next President will have the power to potentially create a 7-2 Supreme Court “Power Pack”.
Think about that…. 7-2,
If the next President appoints 5 young justices, it will guarantee control of the Supreme Court for an entire generation. 7-2 decisions will hold up much more over time than 5-4 decisions.
If Hillary Clinton, wins and gets to make these appointments, you likely will never see another Conservative victory at the Supreme Court level for the rest of your life, and well into your Grandkids life.
“We the People” ……. a phrase that will be extinct, if Hillary is elected.
God I can only hope and pray she does get in after your post. Thanks for helping sway the vote her way!!!
are you CRAZY woman??????????? I can’t understand anyone with any common sense could see what is wrong with that whole concept. (clintons in the whitehouse again???????) It’s just like in the scriptures, when Saul had the blinders on his eyes, then God caused them to fall off and he FINALLY could see ( common sense thing).. I’m praying daily that those of you that still have the blinders on and can’t figure it all out and put it all together yet,,,,, will before election time. cause IF she does get in the whitehouse it’ll be to late for the future generations to have any kind of a decent life.
REP. MATT CARTWRIGHT (D-PA): All right, you were asked about markings on a few
documents. I have the manual here, Marking Classified National Security Information, and I
don’t think you were given a full chance to talk about those three documents with the little c’s
on them. Were they properly documented? Were they properly marked according to the
manual?
JAMES COMEY: No.
CARTWRIGHT: According to the manual — and I ask unanimous consent to enter this into the
record, Mr. Chairman — according to the manual, if you’re going to classify something, there
has to be a header on the document, right?
COMEY: Correct.
And the truth is:
CARTWRIGHT: Was there a header on the three documents that we’ve discussed today that
had the little c in the text someplace?
COMEY: No, there were three emails, the c was in the body, in the text, but there was no
header on the email or in the text.
CARTWRIGHT: So, if Secretary Clinton really were an expert at what’s classified and what’s
not classified, and were following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her
immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that?
COMEY: That would be a reasonable inference.
CARTWRIGHT: Alright. I think you for your testimony, Director. I yield back.
Cris Oppenheimer, crusader for the truth!
• “Endless efforts by congressional Republicans to foil or foul up Hillary Clinton’s run for the presidency have hit a new low. The members of Congress involved cannot [yet] be sued for defamation, since they are protected by the “Speech and Debate Clause” of the Constitution, but the fact that they are not merely smearing the former secretary of state but are trying to send her to jail on phony charges of perjury and lying to Congress is beyond the pale of dirty politics. It is an abuse of power and their efforts to criminalize politics could one-day blowback on them and result in their going to jail on [the] bogus charges [they brought].”
While the perjury charges against those “Three” have to wait, Republican FBI Director James Comey’s persecution could proceed now, because it will not have to rely on proving perjury, but on the much easier False Statement Prohibition of Title 18 of the U.S. Code, section 1001, where the core of the offense is
• “false representation, or concealment, by willful non-disclosure, of a material fact.”
Willful non-disclosure Comey committed at least 5 times by “not” adding, under questioning, to his statement about the importance of a partial confidential marker, the infamous ( c), that
• A) the documents as a total were not only not classified, but
• B) they were easy to identify as not being classified, because there was A) no header and B) no footer indicating classified material (as in, e.g., a fat “CONFIDENTIAL” on top and bottom of each page, in addition to the partial marker ( C)), nor had it the required classification block right above the footer.
The classification block in turn has to have 3 elements:
• C) Who classified it;
• D) Under who’s or which authority was it classified;
• E) The date it becomes unclassified.
To boot, it turns out the material was marked with “( c)” by mistake, flagging future phone calls, a matter obviously not confidential, something any reader will just ignore. In context it appears that the Director, taken to pontificating in public about Secretary Clinton’ negligence to recognize confidential material, was confusing the partial mark, indicating somebody thought there was confidential material, with the actual act of classification .which required ALL of the elements A), B), C), D), and E).
Hi I mistyped my email. Sorry. But I am looking forward to your answer.
Cris Oppenheimer, crusader for the truth!
• “Endless efforts by congressional Republicans to foil or foul up Hillary Clinton’s run for the presidency have hit a new low. The members of Congress involved cannot [yet] be sued for defamation, since they are protected by the “Speech and Debate Clause” of the Constitution, but the fact that they are not merely smearing the former secretary of state but are trying to send her to jail on phony charges of perjury and lying to Congress is beyond the pale of dirty politics. It is an abuse of power and their efforts to criminalize politics could one-day blowback on them and result in their going to jail on [the] bogus charges [they brought].”
While the perjury charges against those “Three” have to wait, Republican FBI Director James Comey’s persecution could proceed now, because it will not have to rely on proving perjury, but on the much easier False Statement Prohibition of Title 18 of the U.S. Code, section 1001, where the core of the offense is
• “false representation, or concealment, by willful non-disclosure, of a material fact.”
Willful non-disclosure Comey committed at least 5 times by “not” adding, under questioning, to his statement about the importance of a partial confidential marker, the infamous ( c), that
• A) the documents as a total were not only not classified, but
• B) they were easy to identify as not being classified, because there was A) no header and B) no footer indicating classified material (as in, e.g., a fat “CONFIDENTIAL” on top and bottom of each page, in addition to the partial marker ( C)), nor had it the required classification block right above the footer.
The classification block in turn has to have 3 elements:
• C) Who classified it;
• D) Under who’s or which authority was it classified;
• E) The date it becomes unclassified.
To boot, it turns out the material was marked with “( c)” by mistake, flagging future phone calls, a matter obviously not confidential, something any reader will just ignore. In context it appears that the Director, taken to pontificating in public about Secretary Clinton’ negligence to recognize confidential material, was confusing the partial mark, indicating somebody thought there was confidential material, with the actual act of classification .which required ALL of the elements A), B), C), D), and E).