6comments

Pollster Attempts to Explain The Hidden Trump Vote Polls Missed

A new theory from an established pollster explains “the hidden trump vote” that showed up Election Day 2016 and shocked the world.

It’s quite simple actually and goes like this – Trump supporters are more likely the personality types who don’t want to waste their time on the phone with a pollster who called unsolicited.

From BusinessInsider 

“Polls might not be capable of predicting elections,” Patrick Murray, the head of Monmouth University’s polling institute, told Business Insider.

Murray’s final Pennsylvania poll showed Clinton with a 4-point lead with a 4.9 percentage point margin of error, which still was not big enough to capture the margin — 1.2 points — by which Trump would win the state.

“It’s an imprecise science,” he said. “It’s a science with a margin.”

With a level of distrust in statistics and polling, heightened by Trump’s months of railing against “dishonest” polls and media outlets, Murray said the result of the election only adds to how “very hard” it is “to fight against that.”

“Do we ever win back the public trust, or in fact, should you even try?” he said. “What did we miss? We know it’s systematic. Can we correct for it?”

But Murray already had developed a theory for what happened: “Non-response among a major core of Trump voters.”

What happened?

Murray’s theory looked as if it had some legs.

For instance, in Pennsylvania and Michigan, Clinton’s total percentage of the final vote fell within 2 points of what had been predicted for her in the polling average. In Wisconsin, Clinton wound up with a near spot-on level of support as the polls had forecast, outperforming the polling average by 0.1 points.

But Trump outperformed his polling average by 4.5 points in Pennsylvania, 5.6 points in Michigan, and an unheard-of 7.6 points in Wisconsin. Underperformances by Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson and Green Party nominee Jill Stein may have contributed to that result, but it didn’t account for such a large discrepancy.

“It’s not that they lied to pollsters, but they didn’t even pick up the phone,” Murray said.

In his final Pennsylvania poll, Murray said, he was accurate around the Philadelphia metro area through Scranton and in the Pittsburgh metro area. But he missed the central, rural part of the state by 20 points: He had polled a 10-point Trump lead while Trump ended up winning that area by 30 points.

“That’s probably the problem across all swing states, and that’s the first state that I looked at because it’s the one I did most recently,” he said. “We were getting metro areas correct, but in the non-metro areas, and this will be true in Wisconsin and Michigan as well, that, a certain type of Trump voter seemed more [unwilling] to talk to pollsters. And, it plays into this whole anti-establishment sense.”

“Just a few points off … is what will cause the entire narrative to be off,” he continued. “This wasn’t just, ‘You got this state poll wrong or this poll didn’t go this way.’ This was a systematic miss of all the polls in the same direction. And I’m going to guess that on metro areas it was spot on.

“We were missing something in rural areas.”

Support the Trump Presidency and help us fight Liberal Media Bias. Please LIKE and SHARE this story on Facebook or Twitter.

6 Comments

  1. John P. Jones
  2. Deplorable G.
  3. Belinda Bell
  4. GREG MILLER
  5. Sandra Fann