Judge Napolitano, a popular contributor on Fox News was “suspended” after he claimed Obama used British Intel agencies, to gather Trump surveillance info.
Napolitano suggested that Obama evaded U.S. law by having British intelligence gather surveillance on the Trump campaign and he said he had 3 sources to back up his claims.
Never the less, he was trashed by the lying liberal media, and Fox News caved to the liberals and suspended him, however, he was eventually brought back.
Below is the original interview segment with the judge.
Watch the video:
— FOX & friends (@foxandfriends) March 14, 2017
Now, after a month, CNN is confirming the judge’s claims.
From Zero Hedge
Now, some 30 days after Napolitano broke the story, CNN seems to have just confirmed it:
British and other European intelligence agencies intercepted communications between associates of Donald Trump and Russian officials and other Russian individuals during the campaign and passed on those communications to their US counterparts, US congressional and law enforcement and US and European intelligence sources tell CNN.
The communications were captured during routine surveillance of Russian officials and other Russians known to western intelligence. British and European intelligence agencies, including GCHQ, the British intelligence agency responsible for communications surveillance, were not proactively targeting members of the Trump team but rather picked up these communications during what’s known as “incidental collection,” these sources tell CNN.
The European intelligence agencies detected multiple communications over several months between the Trump associates and Russian individuals — and passed on that intelligence to the US. The US and Britain are part of the so-called “Five Eyes” agreement (along with Canada, Australia and New Zealand), which calls for open sharing among member nations of a broad range of intelligence.
Of course, we’re quite certain that, as CNN notes, the intercepted communications were merely “incidental” and in no way requested by the Obama administration, but rather, were conveniently volunteered, unsolicited, by British intelligence. Moreover, we’re sure that British intelligence also had very innocent reasons for “accidentally” happening upon the communication of Trump’s advisors. That said, we do wonder whether they also happened upon any communications from the Hillary campaign…