Hillary’s Assault on Free Speech – Vows to “SHUT DOWN” Breitbart if Elected
The politically correct elite are all about silencing “free speech.”
If you do not think and speak like they do, you’re labeled a racist and marked for destruction.
People like Hillary Clinton are free speech assassins.
Case in point – in a recent fundraising email Hillary’s deputy communications director said the following:
“We’ve had a conservative media in this country for a while,” says the email, sent Thursday and signed by deputy communications director Christina Reynolds. “I don’t always like what they have to say, but I respect their role and their right to exist Reynolds’ acknowledgment that the regular conservative media has a “right to exist,” though, is used to contrast it with Breitbart, which apparently has no such right. “Breitbart is something different,” she says.
“They make Fox News look like a Democratic Party pamphlet. They’re a different breed altogether — not just conservative but radical, bigoted, anti-Muslim, anti-Semitic conspiracy peddlers who never have been and never should be anywhere near the levers of power in this country.”
One of the goals of Clinton’s campaign, Reynolds says, is to ensure Breitbart is destroyed.
Those comments should frighten every freedom-loving person in America – no matter what side of the aisle you’re on.
To think that in the year 2016 we have a candidate running for president who openly and proudly boasts about silencing free speech should be the biggest wake-up call you’ve ever had.
Read this line again:
One of the goals of Clinton’s campaign, Reynolds says, is to ensure Breitbart is destroyed.
Now, make sure you vote for Donald Trump.
Amy Moreno is a Published Author, Pug Lover & Game of Thrones Nerd. You can follow her on Twitter here.
Support the Trump Movement and help us fight Liberal Media Bias. Please LIKE and SHARE this story on Facebook or Twitter.
There is a difference between destroying a medium by violating its legal right to express itself (freedom of speech and press) and “destroying” it intellectually by, for example, refuting its arguments, or showing it to be illogical or untruthful. The latter is quite within the rules of a democratic society.