Hey Ladies, it’s YOUR FAULT the Economy SUCKS According to Joe Biden
Well, Joe, some of us can’t get back to work because the economy SUCKS so bad.
Thanks to you, your boss, Obamacare, and the plethora of liberal regulations, and high taxes you’ve strangled our small businesses with, the American economy is on LIFE SUPPORT.
While Biden blames women, let’s remember that Obama and Hillary say the economy is doing good and it’s a “right-wing” conspiracy telling to you that it’s bad.
The economy is the #1 issue in the country.
Trust me, if it was as ROSY as Hillary and Obama say it is, it wouldn’t be the number-one driving issue of 2016.
Biden is right, the economy is a mess – and it’s the globalists fault.
The rich get richer while the rest of us suffer.
That’s globalism, everyone.
From Breitbart:
Democratic Vice President Joe Biden wants American women to get back in the workforce to help boost the economy.
“If we just put all the women back to work, if they were able to afford childcare, we would increase the GDP in America by close to eight tenths of one percent,” he said. “That’s trillions of dollars over the next decade.”
Biden made his remarks during a campaign event for Hillary Clinton at Chatham University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on Tuesday. He pointed out that millions of American women were qualified and educated, but were not participating because of the high cost of child care.
“That’s why women aren’t in the workforce,” he argued.
Hey, numbnuts – stop looking for excuses like, “women aren’t working enough” to justify your crappy economy.
Lower taxes, get rid of regulations and lose Obamacare and watch what happens.
That’s TRUMP’S plan, by the way.
This is a movement – we are the political OUTSIDERS fighting against the FAILED GLOBAL ESTABLISHMENT!
Join the resistance and help us fight to put America First!
Amy Moreno is a Published Author, Pug Lover & Game of Thrones Nerd. You can follow her on Twitter here and Facebook here.
Support the Trump Movement and help us fight Liberal Media Bias. Please LIKE and SHARE this story on Facebook or Twitter.
I’m coining a new word here, “moranity”. It’s a quality of being such a moron that your that your stupidity can only be believed by the clinically insane.
The moranity of this statement cannot be overstated. If you can get past the bizarre sexism of the statement, the economics of it are even worse. Wages are subject to supply and demand. If we “put all the women back to work”, that’s an increase on the supply of labor. That means wages must go down. GDP has nothing to do with wages, it’s tied to productivity. That means we need to produce more, not employ more people. Of course, producing a product with out increasing the number of buyers only increases the supply of, and therefore decreases the value of, the product. So just making a bunch of stuff that no one is buying isn’t really going to make a difference either.
In order to increase the value of labor and get more people into the job market at decent wages, we must increase the demand for our products. That means better quality, increased suitability, or just flat out new products. Of course there are a few products we could have that are in high demand globally. Crude oil comes immediately to mind. Lead is still a very valuable raw material, too. That’s just two examples off the top of my head of products we could be selling that are being stifled or outright crushed by egregious over-regulation. It is the bureaucracy itself that is depressing our GDP, not the labor force. Competition crushing cronyism in D.C. supports outrageous global monopolies that prevent any attempts to bring potentially valuable new products to market. Overbearing regulations and labrynthian tax codes cut off start-ups at the knees while favoring old and bloated established corporations.
People want to complain about “protectionism” when Trump suggest using tariffs to enforce our trade balance. Where’s that same righteous indignation about the protectionism of an executive agency outright banning a product like incandescent light bulbs to the benefit of a mega donor like G.E.? Old style bulbs were unpatented and could be made anywhere so there was tons of competition and the profit margins were small. The compact fluorescents are patent protected and have a much larger profit margin, but environmental regulations prevent them from being manufactured in the United States. The ban on incandescents essentially gave G.E. and Sylvania a competition free market on a product that can only be manufactured overseas. The entrenched D.C. elite don’t have any problems with protectionism when it’s protecting their globalist handler’s bottom lines on the backs of the American work force.
what Ralph answered I didnt know that anybody can get paid $6830 in 1 month on the
computer <for more information click on site HOME MEDIA TECH thank you . if you not like copy you just click on my name.
COPY AND OPEN THIS LINK=❥❥❥❥HERE :)…➥➥➥ www.goldpath55.ℂℴℳ