John Kerry Argues Since Walls Can’t Stop All Terrorists, There’s No Point in Building Them
The nonsensical arguments pro-open borders politicians make against Trump’s common sense border wall is truly astounding.
Up to bat this time is failed Presidential candidate John Kerry. Here is a quote from Kerry’s commencement speech at Northeastern University yesterday.
“Many of you were in elementary school when you learned the toughest lesson of all on 9/11,” he said. “There are no walls big enough to stop people from anywhere, tens of thousands of miles away, who are determined to take their own lives while they target others.”
First of all 9-11 and a border wall have very little in common. A 9-11 styled attack can be prevented from reoccurring with better precautions and training in the airline industry combined with strategic airport security. What does that have to do with the estimated 700,000 illegals that flood through our US-Mexican border yearly including criminals, gang members, and yes, rapists?
Second of all, the logic itself in Kerry’s statement is asinine. Kerry is basically arguing since it’s impossible to stop all terrorism, there’s no point in stopping trespassing. If that is the case why not go further and get rid of our military, police, and secret service while we’re at it, since as Kerry points out, you can’t stop all crime and all terrorism.
John Kerry, like everyone else, lives in a house and locks his doors for a reason. Without a wall, our U.S. Mexican border is like a house with it’s doors unlocked. If Kerry wants to argue against the wall on a philosophical basis, he should symbolically keep the doors to his own house unlocked to gain some credibility that he actually believes his philosophy.



John Kerry thinks he is so smart. Gee, why didn’t anybody think of that Kerry? What would we ever do without you? If the current establishment would stay out of elections American would not be so divided. The President and his cabinet abuse free public service announcement air time allocated for policy business to promote their personal campaigning rhetoric while they receive money from lobbyist and special interest groups, that is a violation of federal law and they should be charged with abuse of power and Censured.