Recently, unhinged Never Trumper, Dana Loesch, went completely crackers and viciously attacked CNN commentator Kayleigh McEnany. McEnany, who had a double mastectomy in an effort to stave off breast cancer which runs rampant in her family and has killed many of her relatives, is an ardent Trump supporter, which really pisses Dana Loesch off.

So much so, that during Dana’s bizarro “bob-and-weave” on-air tirade she resorted to name-calling in its most vile form by referring to Kayleigh as “flat-chested,”  and then hatefully went on to make fun of her hair, teeth, etc.

VILE: Dana Loesch (known 4 dishonesty & bashing Trump) mocks breasts of prominent Trump supporter who had mastectomy pic.twitter.com/5tSBeiqGn9

— ✨Patriotic Mama✨ (@BluegillRises) May 11, 2016

Dana is refusing to apologize, claiming that she’s justified in saying what she did because Donald Trump is a ‘mean person.’ She’s even doubling down on her vile behavior with her latest incoherent blog post. Let’s review it together, shall we?

My notes are in red. 

On Zealous Hypocrisy 

This election cycle the most fervent Trump supporters have excused, defended, even cheered a candidate that has mocked a disabled reporter, the appearance of cancer-survivor Carly Fiorina Carly’s sour puckered face isn’t a result of cancer – it’s from firing 30k Americans and replacing them with foreign workers. (sadly, this gene also runs in my family which has been ravaged by cancer), and women in general  This coming from a “lady” who spent the day belittling a woman & her physical features.

They mob-rage against anyone who demonstrates the slightest difference of opinion This coming from the woman who attacked someone today because they support Trump. with them on Trump-the-candidate and when faced with feedback or criticism they recoil, Earlier you said we “rage” against people and now suddenly we “recoil?” That doesn’t jive, sweetie. as do feminists and Black Lives Matter, in want of a safe space. It’s the furthest thing possible from being “politically incorrect.” <–This line makes zero sense. Please re-write it. In fact, this most fervent group’s behavior is the epitome of Social Justice Warrior Political Correctness. Speaking of “safe spaces” if you criticize Dana on Twitter she RECOILS and blocks you. Just sayin’.

I pointed this out in my monologue (also here and here) regarding a Trump surrogate who had the audacity to play bouncer of the conservative movement by personally attacking and smearing conservatives I know These people “you know” can’t stand up for themselves?  Are they “recoiling” to a “safe place?” and claiming that you can’t be a true conservative unless you whole-heartedly support Donald Trump. Her statement was asinine Earlier you said Trump supporters attack people with differing opinions, isn’t that what you’re doing right now? and my observation, delivered in the stated style of Donald Trump, Yeah, if Donald Trump was a crazy menopausal white lady. was absolutely valid.

That I chose this rhetorical device (I even predicted the outrage and literally mocked it mid-monologue in the video) Honey, it doesn’t take a fortune-teller to know that mocking a woman’s “mastectomy chest” will raise some dander. served the purpose of highlighting the hypocrisy of these most fervent supporters, and they didn’t disappoint with their hypocritical reaction.

My valid remarks<–LOL @”my valid remarks.” Nothing like validating yourself, when no one else will.  struck a chord with this fervent group and perhaps the surrogate herself, First off, you’re not profound enough to “strike chords.” You’re an easy target because you’re an emotional basket-case that speaks before you think. as they chose to fabricate from my words an “attack on mastectomies” (silly, as it falsely presupposes I know as much about the person I criticized as she knew about the people she attacked) So, you randomly attacked her looks and “oops” didn’t realize she had a mastectomy?  Ok. But you won’t give Trump that same benefit of the doubt regarding the NY Times reporter? because it is easier to argue against a straw man than to address my accurate observation <–LOL more “self-validation.”  of the surrogate’s remarks. I’m starting to realize that you don’t know what the word “surrogate” means. 

It’s an offensive, disingenuous, and progressive deflective tactic by people seeking to shrink the definition of “conservative” to include only those people who wholly and without question support Trump. But Never Trump people can claim that Trump is a “liberal” and his supporters are “fervent” idiots and racists?

Shame on these people for such a ridiculous deflection. So, your opinion is “valid” but other people’s opinions are “deflections?” 

These same individuals are willing to trash a large swath of the right, many of whom are my friends, people who have worked tirelessly and without credit since the beginning of the new grassroots movement, simply over the difference of opinion on Trump. The salt-of-the-earth people like Ben Howe who work tirelessly calling Trump’s wife a “whore” or your bat-shit crazy boss who called her a “lesbian porn star?” 

That’s right: These people are willing to trash a decade of work by good people over one disagreement. It’s petty and shows that these people put ego, not country, first. Have you neglected to read the Never Trump memo? It’s basically a HATE GROUP of bitter people that look like angry thumbs. 

It’s also horrible voter outreach and a disservice to the campaign they claim to support as the worst amongst these Trump supporters seek the spotlight while the quiet, discerning ones suffer the indignity of being generalized by the inexcusable behavior of this lot. All of these people deserve better than this. I’d like to see your compiled research and data on Trump supporters. Did you hold focus groups? Spy through windows? Dig through garbage cans? Otherwise, this crap you’re burping up is just hyper-emotional nonsense.

In conclusion: My observation as to the bouncers of conservatism was absolutely valid and deserving. <– LOL more self-validation. My delivery served the stated purpose of showcasing the hypocrisy of this group. Hey, those wussy cancer survivors you hurt will just have to get over it.  This was an official BLAZE experiment in human behavior, conducted and validated by Professor Dana Loesch. 

Maybe they will now think twice before encouraging the Republican nominee in this behavior since they have just discovered how much they dislike it being used against them. Is this where we all say, “Duh! Wow!  Duh! She really taught us a lesson! Duh!” I’m not hopeful, but I do wish they would fight Hillary as much as they attack other conservatives. Do you tell this to your Never Trump crew, as well?

I wasn’t #NeverTrump before, but thanks to the “outreach” of people like this, I and others are just about there.   So, we’re all responsible for Dana’s emotions and actions. She incapable of thinking for herself or acting on her own accord and has surrendered control to “US” and we’ve driven her to the open-arms of Never Trump.

P.S. Bullshit Dana, you’ve always been a Never Trumper. 

*Oh, and a few quick corrections for those zealous Trumpers:

1) I never campaigned for Hillary Clinton. I campaigned for Bill. A rapist. As a teenager, before I could vote, with the Democrat family in which I was raised. You know this because I openly discussed it for years on radio, TV, and in my book as a tool of witness. I’ve been a conservative longer than the front-runner and unlike the front-runner, have never donated to Hillary No, but she’s campaigning for Hillary RIGHT HERE AND NOW. 

2) I’m not Jewish. While I’ve been called a “Jew whore” Hey, at least you weren’t made fun of for having a mastectomy. plenty by some very zealous Trump fans, I am not Jewish, although I love Israel.

3) I don’t have fake boobs. No, but your husband looks like he does. Thanks for assuming though, as it’s a yuge compliment after having two children. Hey, at least you didn’t have a mastectomy, right? 

Amy Moreno is a Published Author, Graphic Designer & Marketing Guru. You can follow her on Twitter here.