7comments

CIA Veterans Wary Over “Russian Hacking Hysteria” Saying it Appears “Politicized”

CIA veterans, none of which are “Trump fans,” are urging caution and restraint over a leaked CIA report that claims Russia interfered in the election to help Trump win.

The report is conjecture, and provides no evidence of so-called “hacking to help Trump.”

CIA Veterans are urging caution on the matter.if Russian hacking occurred, they still wonder how anyone can presume to know Putin’s “motives.”

Let’s agree, hypothetically-speaking, that Russian hacking occurred – how does the CIA know Putin’s “motives?”

From Newsweek:

CIA veterans—none of them fans of Donald Trump–are urging caution about leaked allegations that Russia waged a secret campaign to put the New York Republican into the White House.

“I am not saying that I don’t think Russia did this,” Nada Bakos, a top former CIA counterterrorism officer tells Newsweek, in a typical comment. “My main concern is that we will rush to judgment. The analysis needs to be cohesive and done the right way.”

Reports on the alleged Russian effort have been anything but cohesive, or complete. During a closed-door briefing to the House Intelligence Committee last week, a  senior FBI counterintelligence official reportedly scoffed  at the CIA’s conclusion that Russia had plotted to put Trump in office, calling the evidence “fuzzy” and “ambiguous.” Details of the meeting were leaked to The Washington Post.

Another former senior official, who said he was reluctant to go on the record on “something that has obviously been politicized,”  tells Newsweek that he, too, is wary of reports that CIA knows for certain that the Kremlin designed a hacking campaign with the specific goal of electing Trump, as opposed to just damaging Hillary Clinton, a hawk on Russia. In order to know Moscow’s intentions, he said, U.S. intelligence would have to have more than cyber-tracks showing Russia’s spy services transferred emails it stole from the Democratic National Committee to WikiLeaks, the whistleblower group led by Julian Assange.

It would need, he said, a mole in the bowels of the Russian spy services or ruling circles. “Let’s assume the agency was able to pinpoint Russian hackers as those responsible for stealing the emails, and also let’s assume those Russian hackers were working for Russian intelligence,” said the former CIA official, a top intelligence analyst.  “OK, then let’s assume there is solid proof that Russian intelligence directed hackers passed the information to WikiLeaks/Assange. Even if all that is true, how would the CIA determine the Russian motivation for passing the information? That would presumably require a human agent behind the curtain with certain knowledge of Putin’s thinking and intentions.”  

Amy Moreno is a Published Author, Pug Lover & Game of Thrones Nerd. You can follow her on Twitter here and Facebook here.

Support the Trump Presidency and help us fight Liberal Media Bias. Please LIKE and SHARE this story on Facebook or Twitter.

7 Comments

  1. Walter Tillis
  2. nm
  3. Edd Morton
  4. David
  5. Kathryn Cobb
  6. Diana