BREAKING : Liberals DEMAND the Electoral College be POSTPONED Due to “Russian Hacking”
Well, we all knew this was coming.
Liberals are now calling for the electoral college to be postponed due to the (fake) Russian Hacking story.
From American Lookout:
The truth is that liberal Americans are a threat to our democracy. They have whipped themselves up into a frenzy with conspiracy theories about Russia to the point where they now want to postpone the Electoral College vote on December 19th.
This is nothing more than a last ditch effort to keep Trump from becoming president.
Take a look at this report from the liberal Huffington Post:
The December 19 Electoral College Vote Must Be Postponed Until We Figure Out What’s Going On With Russian Electoral Interference
In a post-truth political sphere, it’s almost impossible to find consensus.
Trump won the Electoral College resoundingly; Clinton won the popular vote by millions. Trump’s November 8th coalition comprised as unusual and diverse an ideological coalition as the U.S. has seen; nearly half of Clinton voters thought Sanders should’ve been the Dem nominee.
But here are three things all Americans, no matter their politics, agree on:
1. Foreign governments should play no role in the outcome of American elections.
2. No person should ascend to the presidency due to the interference of a hostile foreign government.
3. We have absolutely no idea whether a foreign government played a role in the outcome of the recent general election, and therefore we have no idea whether a political candidate is about to ascend to the presidency due to the interference of a hostile foreign government.
These people are in total denial. They can’t accept the truth so they’re making things up to make themselves feel better.
We had an election. Trump won, Hillary lost.
Support the Trump Presidency and help us fight Liberal Media Bias. Please LIKE and SHARE this story on Facebook or Twitter.
foreign government were donating to Clinton foundation. Bill said they’d only stop taking thier money once Hillary was in the White House. Liberals have no way to quantify if voters even cared about the wikileaks material. Everyone knows Hillary had all sorts of crooked deals going from all the deleted emails.
Exactly, amazing that nobody is stressing the fact that the the demons aren’t denying the veracity of the emails that prove how corrupt Killery and her campaign really are. Just that they were hacked with no proof of who did the hacking.
Exacrty. Russia didn’t make Hillary set up an illegal private server. The Russians didn’t make her lie to everyone.’ She had NO message other than blasting Trump. She has a terrible persona, They “remade her” several times, but she is just not likeable. And her political experience was one disaster and lie after another. SHE lost her own election but they are trying to blame someone Can you imagine what the left would do if she won & Trump was doing this?!!!!
That’s like saying, “Hillary didn’t win, i wanna recount.”
let us assume for the sake of discussion, such liberals are being forthright, which i believe they are not.
what proof have they russia has been “caught” at anything, let alone “interfering” in an election, so as to warrant stopping our electoral process in its tracks? only this: self-serving, vacuous, conclusory, subjective, at best anecdotal “proof” from their own inventive mouths and minds, in the face of evidence the nsa was wikileaks’ source. case closed.
now, let’s assume their specious argument is correct: that a change was effected due to russia’s interference. how do they account for 3000+ counties for trump, to 50+ counties for clinton, and clinton having only 30 persons at many rallies and who were paid for such presence, and clinton’s cancellation of no-show rallies?
specifically, in this regard, i ask of them, how do they, or can they, account for the numerically causal effect russian interference had in this outcome of 60 for trump, to 1 for clinton? this, while clinton outspent trump 2 to 1, with no evidence of her source of same.
further, as to the “solemn responsibillty of electors”, and the sanctity of the election process, as pizza johnny has memed, with the chorus chiming in, how do they account for what we witnessed publicly in confessions made by confessed clinton operatives who paid “crazy people” to “do their thing,” including “the duck” and, further, to conjure up violent pre-election acts, and even post-election. in that i regard, i also ask if by their silence this group of “concerned citizens” condones the violence led by various operatives of soros/clintion and craigslist, to try to effect this election’s “do-over.”
still further, since they are so concerned about outside international interference in this election, i would like to know whether they have ever complained about or called for official investigation into improprieties involving:
a) robby mook’s comments about potential 2016 fara violations, saying american citizens representing paying foreign interests in this election was ok with him;
b) bill clinton’s admissions in the chinagate affair of 1996, that he and hillary both took contributions from the chinese communists, in exchange for their being given american nuclear missile and satellite technology;
c) money contributions given in previous clinton presidential campaigns on behalf of the communist chinese, presumably seeking to “interfere” with our elections, by convicted fugitive charlie trie; “billionaire” peasant farmer, ng lap seng, acting as a front for the chinese communist government; felon johnny chung, admittedly on behalf of communist china’s general ji shegde; john huang; fugitive ted sioeng;
d) the clinton foundation, and any influence over the course of the 2016 election by international monies that flowed into it from saudi arabia, qatar, kuwait, the emirates, brunei, and other middle eastern tyrannical regimes;
e) their “own” seth rich’s intra-campaign brutal slaying and murder.
moreover, i ask, philosophically, if information provided about emailgate or any other scandal in an election campaign is true, no matter the source, what is unfair or undue about such interference or influence, if such truth miraculously enters the public mind of voters? i ask this, since curiously not clinton nor pizza johnny or any other person has ever denied the veracity of the underlying information. their only complaint is about the source. the police, fbi, our investigative agencies do not subscribe to such nonsense with “snitches”, nor does the entire body of whistlerblower laws. but this renegade bunch does.
in short, let us even assume there was russian influence or interference, which i disbelieve (the nsa has been proven to be wikileaks’ source). but the unfair or undue part has not been, unless the intent and outcome of this complaining crew is to deceive the public, and have it vote in favor of a criminal or ethically challenged person. simply put: influence or interference is not unfair nor undue influence or interference, until proven so. adjectives count. and anyways, when, if ever, was mere truth, especially in elections, unfair or undue influence or interference? i need clarification on this, for my God stands for truth, no matter the source, and He is truth.
careful analysis matters. further, data matters, if not, we are simply a crybaby lynch mob nation, or worse, and deeply in trouble.
just my 2 centavos.
Very well stated. Thank you.
Liberals, the LOST FRONTIER!!! Their ignorance can only be outperformed by their everyday STUPIDITY!!! This is the result of trophies for everyone, time out zones, safe zones and BLAME!!!
The way she is acting now is proof she would not make a good president…..and those emails…Benghazi….uranium deal with Russia…and the list goes on and on….
Two ambassadors now have said that Russia did NOT give info to Wikileaks. According to them there was no hack. It was a DNC insider leak and they know who it was. Wikileaks says the same thing…investigate that!
If the only interference was exposing the truth, what does it matter where the Truth came from? The Truth exposed Crooked Hillary as a liar and a criminal. The Truth exposed the DNC conspiring to help her and eliminate Sanders. The truth exposed the violent “plants” at Trump rallies to try to make him look bad. The truth showed that the Major Media companies were in collusion with her and fed her questions for debates, cleared news stories through her office, and pandered to her at every turn. Then, Predictably, the Truth allowed the American people to overwhelmingly choose Donald J Trump as our next President. Who actually cares at all if it’s The TRUTH!
Fake
my stepmom got a year old Saab by working parttime off of a computer… over at this website………..
follow this link…..★★★◕◡◕◕◡◕◕◡◕
❥❥❥❥❥❥❥ Spacial~Work AtHome.
Obama thoughts, if we let Trump become president. Trump will find out about our dirty secrets. Obama was born in Kenya. Makes Obama a fraud. That chem trails are not for controlling the weather, actually to cuase the American people to get sick and die. Hillary Paedophile should be at the top plus all people her and Obama have killed. The billions they have stolen the list is to long. I’m sure Obama will declare martial law and make him self king of America.