BREAKING : Liberal Women are OK With Calling the First Lady a “HOOKER”

It’s hard to take liberals and feminism seriously when they’re so hypocritical.

They do not care about “women” or “women’s rights.”

They only care about those women who agree with their politics.

If you don’t agree, it’s OK to call you names, like “hooker.”

From Daily Caller

A man called a woman a hooker, another woman defended her, and some “feminists” are pissed.

Don’t get your hopes up, though. They’re mad at the women, not the man.

New York Times reporter Jacob Bernstein — iconic reporter Carl Bernstein’s 38-year-old son — said first lady Melania Trump is a hooker while at a New York Fashion Week event Feb. 12. He was sitting next to Victoria’s Secret model Emily Ratajkowski. Although she didn’t name him, she attacked him for “slut shaming” in a series of tweets the next morning. Melania later tweeted a “thank you” to Ratajkowski, and Bernstein since been reprimanded.

Sat next to a journalist from the NYT last night who told me "Melania is a hooker." Whatever your politics it's crucial to call this out for

— Emily Ratajkowski (@emrata) February 13, 2017

what it is: slut shaming. I don't care about her nudes or sexual history and no one should.

— Emily Ratajkowski (@emrata) February 13, 2017

Gender specific attacks are disgusting sexist bullshit.

— Emily Ratajkowski (@emrata) February 13, 2017

Slate copy editor Heather Schwedel, who should have copy edited her story into nonexistence, described the incident as an “annoying nontroversy” Feb. 14. It’s a non-issue presumably because Melania is by default not a woman, and barely a human being, thanks to her surname.

Emily Ratajkowski defending Melania Trump is not what we need right now: https://t.co/saujX022RP pic.twitter.com/qOYQL2gzQc

— Slate (@Slate) February 16, 2017

“On Monday, Ratajkowski tweeted that a journalist she sat next to, presumably at a private event, had told her that Melania was a ‘hooker,’” Schwedel wrote. Note she defends Bernstein by writing that his sexism is OK because the event was “presumably” private.

Her second argument for why this is really not that big of a deal? Donald Trump.

“While protesting slut-shaming is a valid stance, if this seems like an annoying nontroversy, well, that might be an even more a valid stance.” she explained, as if being married to Donald strips Melania of all dignity and self-worth. “When defending Melania, why not also point out how much her husband’s administration’s policies stand to hurt women’s rights and safety?”

Vogue’s Michelle Ruiz wrote Feb. 14 that Melania’s appreciative tweet to Ratajkowski using the hashtag #PoweroftheFirstLady was “ironic.”

“This type of female support is a nice sentiment, of course,” Ruiz said, “but it reads as more than a bit ironic coming from Mrs. Trump.”

Ratajkowski, who’s a Sen. Bernie Sanders fan, stood up for the wife of a man she’s most definitely not a fan of, President Donald Trump. She stood up for Melania because feminism bypasses political ideology, and when one woman is being targeted, another should be there to fight back. Melania’s value is not negated by the man she’s married to or how active she chooses to be as first lady, and Schwedel and Ruiz demanding caveats when defending her is the worst kind of feminist failure.

Make a note that both the Slate and Vogue writers are women.

Amy Moreno is a Published Author, Pug Lover & Game of Thrones Nerd. You can reach her on Facebook here.