7comments

BREAKING : Clinton Foundation FOREIGN Donors Expected “Benefits In Return for Gifts”

An independent “governance review” conducted by a prominent law firm specializing in philanthropic matters concluded that the Clinton Foundation had a feckless “rubber stamp” board of directors and that most foreign donors had “an expectation of a quid pro quo benefits in return for gifts.”

From Daily Caller:

The blistering review — made public Thursday by WikiLeaks — described a tax-exempt public foundation with none of the independent oversight required under federal charity law. The Clinton Foundation reported $187 million in net assets in 2011.

The decision to conduct the review was bitterly opposed by Bill Clinton’s long-time friends and political advisers. (RELATED: WIKILEAKS: Bill’s Old Cronies Fought Chelsea’s Clinton Foundation Reforms)

The review was conducted by the New York law firm of Simpson Thacher and was requested by Chelsea Clinton who had profound misgivings about the operation of her parent’s foundation. Leading the review was Victoria Bjorklund, one of the nation’s top-ranked legal experts on good-governance practices for foundations and charities. She came out of retirement to lead the review.

She created and previously headed Simpson’s tax-exempt group which advises public charities, private foundations, boards, and donors. Bjorklund was named “2014 Nonprofit Lawyer of the Year” by Best Lawyers Magazine.

Simpson Thacher found numerous weaknesses in the Clinton Foundation’s management structure, including a board consisting entirely of insiders loyal solely to Bill and Hillary Clinton, the board’s failure to oversee finances properly, inherent conflict of interests and the use of audits based on cash accounting rather than the federally mandated accrual basis. (RELATED: Clinton Foundation Ignored All ‘Best Practices’ For Good Governance)

But most serious disclosure in the review was that donors expected a “quid pro quo” in return for their contributions. “Some interviewees reported conflicts of those raising funds or donors, some of whom may have an expectation of quid pro quo benefits in return for gifts.”

This is more of the “pay to play” money scam Clinton was running out of the state department.

….and people are actually supporting her.

Shocking.

Amy Moreno is a Published Author, Pug Lover & Game of Thrones Nerd. You can follow her on Twitter here and Facebook here.

Support the Trump Movement and help us fight Liberal Media Bias. Please LIKE and SHARE this story on Facebook or Twitter.

7 Comments

  1. SH
  2. david
    • Illinois family
  3. Illinois family
  4. SH
    • SH